V7#5b9

For the past several years I’ve been taking the slow lane, prescribed by the jazz guitar industrial complex. Learn your scales, modes, arpeggios, seventh chords and their extensions, drop voicings, and all the fingering patterns on the fretboard. Build your jazz vocabulary: licks, riffs, melodic patterns, sequences, etc. When you still don’t sound like the masters, you’re told to transcribe their solos. And don’t forget to learn the academic music theory that you are then to forget. Well, that’s nice and dandy, but it takes forever and there’s no guarantee, especially, when you’re older. Nonetheless, you’re satisfied enjoying the process. Sounds familiar? I personally don’t mind the approach. On the contrary, I like all the theory, but I wish there was a better way to implement it. Kind of like going with the flow rather than always relying on memorized vocabulary. Believe it or not, but there is a better and faster way. Skepticism is normal and I was full of it until I tried it myself. Before I share it I’d like you to do a little experiment. Map out the C major triad on the fretboard using CAGED for reference, or just use the attached image. Get familiar with the patterns, but do not just play them up and down like a scale. Triads are the most perfect form of organized structure. They act as stable resolution points for our lines or melodies. The other nine notes offer varying degree of tension, each one has a different character or color, but for this experiment just use tension 2, 4, and/or 6 (meaning the 2nd, 4th, and/or 6th degree of the C major scale). Using one of the 5 patterns, play around with the C major triad (different combinations of 1, 3, and 5, different rhythms) introducing 2, 4, or 6 here and there. You can combine them, but initially use just one to hear how it works with the triad. When you introduce a tension note, it will want to resolve. You can resolve it to the root, third or fifth of the C major triad. That’s how you can spontaneously create melodic phrases, and you won’t sound like you’re running the C major scale even though you are using its notes. If you feel more adventurous, you can try it over ii-V7-I-VI7 in the key of C. You won’t be outlining the changes yet, but it will be a lot of fun. There’s much more to the Melodic Triads method including “Practical Perfect Pitch,” but if you like what you hear when experimenting, you may want to check it out. I joined the program two months ago and I’ve made more progress with it than over the last two years with the traditional method. If you have any questions, ask in the thread. Here’s an interview with Jordan Klemons:

@Eracer_Team-DougH You can buy the book direct and get the 850-page hardcover plus instant digital edition for just $49.95 or choose digital-only for $29.95 at this LINK. As for people hanging in the chat of Live Lessons, that’s all nice and dandy, but it can be a distraction. I rarely watch the stream these days, but if I did I’d rather focus on the lesson. I know one can do all the focusing on the recorded version, but still … The real chat and interaction in the form of posts would be better on the discussion board where there’s a lot of time for individual input rather than trying to squeeze something in during scrolling chat feed. That’s just my take on it.

No replies? No-one considers himself or herself a musician? Not even a potential candidate for one? I don’t think so. Nonetheless, this is quite revealing. I’ve been checking this forum recently and the activity is remarkably low. It appears that some members of the old gang are occasionally here, but the new members participation is minimal. It feels more like an archive than a discussion board these days. There’s nothing to revisit or explore? I guess the emoticons and emojis save us time, but they have made us lazy as well. Pretty soon we’ll forget how to express ourselves altogether. That’s only part of the sad state of affairs. I thought musicality would be a hot topic for like-minded people, eager to exchange ideas, etc., but I guess I might be wrong. Here’s a suggestion for the forum administration. Make new membership a two-step process: initial and full. In the initial step sign up a member and allow for (let’s say) three moderated posts to gain full membership status without further moderation. This will jump-start the new member’s activity and create encouragement for further participation. If someone wants to stay on the sidelines, why bother signing up in the first place?

This is a relatively new publication which I highly recommend, especially, for an adult music learner. Don’t let the slogan under the title be a turnoff! It’s probably your fixed mindset, misconceptions about talent and age, self-doubt, or wishful thinking raising the red flag. I’ve recently begun working with the book and I can honestly say – I wish I had been given the book on day one of my musical journey. It is truly the missing manual on learning music intuitively and holistically. It’s not a dry textbook or a method book on how to play an instrument. This approach should be integrated into music education as the standard component. We all have the capacity to be musicians. The abilities and skills of musicianship are all learnable. Regardless of whether you encounter obstacles on your musical journey or not, the book may turn out to be much more than you expected. Simply look up “Musicality” by Christopher Sutton on Amazon. By the way, this is not a paid advertisement. I don’t even know why I need to include this statement, but I’ve got a feeling I should. People are suspicious these days and so am I. There are reasons for this sad state of affairs which I won’t get into. So get the book and have fun with it!

I don’t recall anybody ever posting a comparison of their two or more guitars of the same type. So I thought it wouldn’t be a bad idea. Besides, I’m enjoying my retirement and more spare time. As I had indicated in my Epiphone Broadway post I wanted D’Angelico Excel EXL-1 for a long time. It wasn’t easy to get my hands on it, but I finally did it. To digress for a moment, I already have an Excel EX-DC (semi-hollow) which I got back in 2014, shortly after the brand had re-entered the market. Back then I figured they needed to put out good products to succeed. I wasn’t wrong. Frankly, it rivals my Gibson ES-335 and although I called my Gibby the real deal I actually bought a not-so-cheap piece of nostalgia. Don’t get me wrong. I dig my Gibby and it’s a great guitar, but I’m more and more convinced that I got myself an image. There are guitars just as good if not better out there. Back to the main theme. It’s been over a decade since D’Angelico hit the market and I hoped they didn’t begin to slack. Again, I wasn’t wrong. I can’t speak for every single one, but my Excel EXL-1 is literally flawless in terms of craftsmanship with great setup and crazy low action. I love it. What struck me the most was the acoustic quality of the instrument. It sounds strikingly similar to D’Angelico Originals. Maybe it’s got something to do with D’Angelico Electrozinc round wound strings which apparently are the re-creation of the original invention by renowned luthier John D’Angelico and master string maker John D’Addario. Regardless, the arch-top is a keeper for sure. And so is the customized Broadway. I put a fret wrap behind the nut and rubber grommets behind the bridge to eliminate micro-overtones. The Broadway sounds cleaner this way. With Gibson ‘57 Classic humbucker in the neck position the Broadway sounds like the real L-5. Of course, the Henriksen amp handles the arch-tops or any other guitar superbly, giving you that classic jazz tone. Picture included. So how do they compare? Let’s consider some differences: Excel EXL-1 vs Customized Broadway Strings: D’Angelico Electrozinc Jazz 12-52 D’Addario Chromes 12-52 flat wound Fingerboard: Ebony Pau Ferro Body Depth: 3” 3 1/8” Bridge: Ebony Pau Ferro Tailpiece: D’Angelico Stairstep Frequensator Neck Pickup: Saymour Duncan 59 humbucker Gibson 57 Classic humbucker Made in: Korea China Obviously, they sound similar, but not the same. Each one has its own character or voice. Both have a broad dynamic range and sound good acoustically. The D’Angelico with a single humbucker and controls mounted on the pick-guard has more going for it in that respect. Plugged in they both can sound very similar depending on the EQ. On the scale from one to ten I’ll give D’Angelico 10 out of 10 and Epiphone 9 out of 10.

"In his new book, The Holistic Guitarist, Acoustic Guitar contributing editor Sean McGowan offers a comprehensive approach to staying healthy, practicing creatively, and improving as a musician."

@Gary Nelson @Gene C Blu Ten is definitely a great amp. It handles arch-top guitars extremely well and generates that classic jazz tone. Luckily, the volume can be set relatively low so they won’t necessarily hear me.

There is only one picture with two items in it. I uploaded it to the Gallery and then inserted in the post. I can see the picture in both places. The first item is an arch-top guitar D’Angelico Excel EXL-1 in dark iced tea burst. The second item is a jazz amp Henriksen Blu Ten. I’m not sure why you don’t see any pictures.

@jasn This is definitely a polyphonic instrument.

I’ve recently become a senior citizen and I thought the age of retirement called for a special celebration. So I’ve allowed myself to acquire a couple of higher end items. They are my final choices and from now on, I will probably begin to sell off the gear I no longer, or seldom use. No lengthy post this time, just a picture.

Epiphone decided to refresh some models for 2023 to celebrate their 150th anniversary. So I thought it would be a good time to get the Casino. Well, it arrived with a few minor detail oriented shortcomings. The output jack was loose. Tone knob for the neck pickup came off easily. I fixed both issues. The pickguard “E” started to peel off. Initially, I was gonna reglue it, but I decided to remove the whole thing. The guitar looks much better without it, anyway. There’s one more thing I will have to work on. After checking the setup, I measured the nut height at the first fret, and I’ll have to cut the slots to improve tuning stability and intonation. I’ve done it before on my Broadway. Overall, I’m happy with the Casino. The guitar is well made. It looks and sounds great. Although the playability is fine, it will improve when I file down the nut slots. Now, I didn’t get it just because the Beatles had used the Casinos. I got it because of the following factors: Hollow body Light weight Comfort (16th fret neck joint makes the 24.75” scale length feel shorter) Less prone to feedback than my Broadway Loud enough acoustically to practice unplugged Great jazz sound when plugged in Historically, the Epiphone Casino is essentially an equivalent to Gibson ES-330 with some small cosmetic differences. This one was made in China, but I’ll give it a score of 9 out of 10 due to the above-mentioned issues.

@Ice9 For some reason the log has never appealed to me, but it’s not a bad choice. @Wim VD1 Sheraton II Pro is in my arsenal already. It’s in the Gallery. Close call, by the way. @Eracer_Team-DougH Interesting choice, but I don’t see Baritone Ukulele in their line-up. @Strings It’s an acoustic/electric guitar. Well, I hope this way of NGD posting was a bit of fun, but perhaps it’s time to carry on and open the bag. Coming up shortly.